Monday, December 31, 2012

Taking the Time to Reflect

Check out my latest on the Differential: Taking the Time to Reflect

Friday, September 28, 2012

Update from Mentoring in Medicine, Inc.


MIM PROGRAMS-CALL FOR APPLICATIONS

MIM Emergency Department Clinical Exposure and Mentoring Program at Montefiore
Are you a college/post-baccalaureate student living in the NYC area?Applications are due on Friday, October 5, 2012 for the fall/winter session. Visithttp://medicalmentor.ning.com/ for application.

Medical Pathway Program

Are you studying to take the MCAT and planning to apply to medical school in 2013? MPP is a twelve week preparatory boot camp for medical school (Live and Virtual). 
You can attend in-person (NYC area) or from the comfort of your home (national).
Applications are due on Friday, October 12, 2012 for the fall session
. Visit
http://medicalmentor.ning.com/ for application.

FREE RESOURCES


Great Information for ALL Students--Study Tips
Visit 
http://medicalmentor.ning.com/ for excellent tips from Learning
Strategies for Success in Medical School by the University of New Mexico
School of Medicine, Hispanic and Native American Center of Excellence
Speak Like a Health Professional
Complete this tutorial on medical word roots to help you understand the more
complicated terms:

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/medicalwords.htm
Learn about Medical News
Register today!
Sign up for the below free resources:
1-
http://www.medpagetoday.com/
2-
http://www.medscape.com

Friday, August 31, 2012

Fastathon 2012: First Wave of Fasters

Read about Fastathon 2012, a fundraiser taking place at Mount Sinai to raise money for the student-run clinic: the East Harlem Health Outreach Partnership (EHHOP).

Fastathon 2012: First Wave of Fasters: Hi all! We have officially rolled out recruitment for Mount Sinai students to fast. A copy of the email is pasted below for those of you t...

Thursday, August 2, 2012

A Second Blog!

I've been away for some time, but have returned with good news. I am now a regular blogger for the Medscape/WebMD blog called the Differential. I will still post original entries here periodically, and I will always provide links to my posts on the Differential. Thank you for your continued support!

Check out the Differential.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The 12 Types of Med Students


What type of medical student will I be? I recently came across a very funny comic by Dr. Michelle Au, that outlines stereotypical medical student personalities. I couldn’t help but wonder what type of medical student I will be.

I am certainly enthusiastic— though I hope not painfully so. But even if so, I will not apologize because the field of medicine is truly fascinating. While volunteering in an emergency department in the Bronx, part of my job was to ensure patients were comfortable during the long wait. I walked around and asked each patient (mostly in Spanish) if they needed water, a snack or extra pillows. Witnessing this small gesture make a difference in the patient’s hospital-experience sent me soaring. The prospect of having an even larger impact, as a physician, is all the more exciting. I was also amazed while shadowing a surgeon as she performed a rhinoplasty (nose job). Even from my position as wallflower in the operating room, the skill and focus with which the doctor went to work was captivating. I also got a peek into the human body—something you don’t see every day. I am enthusiastic because this is the field I love, the profession I have always wanted to pursue, my calling. I cannot wait to dive in, come August.

At times I am the Overly Academic. Ask anyone who has been around me while I describe my research or get into a heated ethical debate (yes, I am guilty of quoting statistics from a recent article I've read). However, again this is the result of my passion for the field and curiosity for the world around me. I am also part Gunner as I strive to be the best physician I can be for my prospective patients (but don’t worry, no cut-throat attitude here). I also exhibit the Sensitive Soul. In medical school I hope to learn the art of doctoring, ensuring that my compassion successfully transmits to the patient-doctor relationship. I am also sure that I will be the Crier on more than a few occasions in coming years. Medical school is stressful and I expect to learn more about myself in four years than I have in a lifetime. It will be an exciting but trying time, and I know I will rely on the support of family and friends to successfully make it to the other side of my training. A good medical student, a good physician, is all of these stereotypes—they’re human! Lastly, during the next several years I hope to keep my sanity (though I've never been a fan of folding jeans)!

Friday, June 29, 2012

Health Care Reform: Upheld by the Supreme Court



On Thursday, June 28, the Supreme Court upheld President Obama's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The law seeks to make health insurance more affordable for all and provide increased consumer protections (e.g. prevent discrimination by health insurance companies against individuals with pre-existing health conditions). But what are some of the actual act's directives?


Since 2010, the law has already:
  • ended discrimination against children with pre-existing conditions.
  • extended coverage to younger adults (up to age 26) by allowing them to stay on their parents health insurance plan
  • prohibited health insurance companies from dropping people's coverage when they get sick.
  • increased federal matching funds for Medicaid.
  • set forth initiatives to strengthen the primary care workforce.
  • sought to bring down the price of health care premiums by requiring that at least 85% of all premium dollars collected by insurance companies be spent on health care services and health care quality improvement (rather than for profit).
  • encouraged the use of integrated health systems (i.e. Accountable Care Organizations).
  • required federal agencies to record a wider range of demographic data in an effort to understand health disparities.

In 2013, the law will:
  • provide new funding to state Medicaid programs that choose to cover preventive services for patients at little or no cost.
  • establish a national pilot program to encourage hospitals, doctors, and other providers to work together to improve the coordination and quality of patient care.
  • increase Medicaid payments for primary care doctors.
  • provide additional funding for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

In 2014, the law will:
  •  require individuals to purchase health insurance (this is the "individual mandate" that was the subject of debate). If affordable coverage is not available to an individual, they will be eligible for an exemption.
  • prohibit insurance companies from refusing to sell coverage or renew policies because of an individual's pre-existing conditions.
  • prohibit plans from imposing annual dollar limits on the amount of coverage an individual may receive.
  • provide tax credits to make it easier for the middle class to afford insurance.
  • ask States to open health insurance exchanges to enable all Americans to easily shop for more affordable private insurance.
  • increase access to medicaid for Americans who earn less than 133 percent of poverty limit.

Finally, in 2015 the law will:
  • compensate physicians for the quality of care they provide to their patients rather than the volume of services they provide.

While many of these provisions will not be well-received by everyone, and some of these provisions admittedly do not do enough to reform the health care system, this is a step in the right direction.

Friday, June 22, 2012

LGBT Pride


We have come a long way since HIV was labeled the “gay disease.” This label was spawned from fear of HIV, and based on the observation that the first cases of HIV appeared in gay men in the early 1980’s. However, this label was not only discriminatory but also inaccurate as intravenous drug users also became infected. Furthermore, by the mid 1980’s children (usually those born to drug users) began to show symptoms of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Some people also contracted the virus via blood transfusions. Despite our best efforts and advances in medicine, HIV/AIDS still affects roughly 34 million people worldwide; people from many different ethnic groups and religions, with different socioeconomic backgrounds and sexual preferences. However, disparities still exist. According to AIDS.gov, in the United States, 61% of new HIV cases in 2009 were via male-to-male sexual contact; the ethnic groups most severely affected were Blacks/African-Americans and Latinos (even among females). What do all of these statistics tell us? We need to do a better job.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals (LGBT) experience various health disparities, not just those related to HIV/AIDS. This effect is compounded if the person belongs to multiple minority groups (for example, Latino and gay or female and transgender). Many studies have shown a direct correlation between the number of minority groups one belongs to and the discrimination he or she faces. This discrimination, in addition to identity issues and problems fitting in or strained relationships with unsupportive friends and family, can lead to many mental health problems. These problems include depression, anxiety, substance abuse and suicide. According to Youth Pride, Inc., gay and lesbian youth are three times more likely to attempt suicide and suffer higher rates of verbal abuse and isolation than their heterosexual counterparts. Additionally, LGBT youth are more likely to be isolated, homeless and be victims of physical and sexual abuse. All of this contributes to poor physical and mental health …and so the cycle continues.

Disparities surrounding access to proper medical care also exist for LGBT individuals. Bias or cultural incompetence within the health care system create barriers to care. Lesbian and bisexual women are not screened as often for breast and cervical cancer. Transgender individuals are less likely to have health insurance. Marriage inequality and a lack of equal rights for LGBT domestic partners (compared to married individuals) also exacerbates these problems. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), seeks to alleviate some of these problems by improving access to health care for all Americans, guiding state Medicaid agencies on financial protections for same-sex couples and improving health data collection for the LGBT community and other minorities.

In commemoration of the Stonewall Riots in New York City in 1969, June is celebrated as LGBT Pride Month. Since the 1960’s the LGBT community has increased its visibility as a social group and successfully demanded rights it was not previously afforded. However, discrimination, inequality and health disparities still exist. Individuals from all walks of life can play a part in resolving these issues. Strive to be accepting of others and encourage leaders and lawmakers to enact legislation that will ensure equality for all.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Racism and Health Outcomes


 
Not long ago, I wrote about the role of race in predicting and treating disease. Recently, I had the pleasure of listening to David Chae, SciD, MA, professor at the Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, speak about racism and health outcomes—particularly cardiovascular risk and aging. While the two ideas sound similar, racism and its effect on people’s health is related to my last post but is a different concept.

“How does racism get under the skin?” Dr. Chae asked.  Discrimination is a process by which individuals are treated differently (and usually unfairly) on the basis of a particular characteristic (e.g. ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age). Racism is a discriminatory ideology that extends beyond an isolated encounter; racism is often ingrained within society. The systemic discrimination that constitutes racism is thought to cause stress which can have serious health consequences, but how?

Scientists at Harvard developed the implicit association test (IAT) to measure a person’s racial bias, even if the person is unaware of any such bias. Respondents are first asked to associate images of faces to particular words (e.g. a Caucasian face with the word “white”). Then the subject is asked to associate words like “beautiful” with “good” and “horrible” with “bad.” The subjects are finally asked to associate words like “beautiful” or “horrible” with word clusters like “black/good” or “white/bad.” The rate of responding on each of these tasks is compared. If a subject takes longer to place a good word like “beautiful” with the word cluster “black/good”, then they are said to have an anti-black bias. It is also possible to have an anti-white bias. Take the test here and see where you stand.

In his talk, Dr. Chae quoted one statistic that reported 80% of Whites and 50% of Blacks have an anti-black implicit bias. Clearly, racism is not just about hating another group of people; Black people can have an implicit anti-black bias. This may be the result of a history of institutionalized racism prior to the civil rights movements in the United States, and cases of de facto racism that continue today. In 1939, Dr. Kenneth Clark conducted a test in which he presented Black children with two dolls and asked the child to choose the nicer doll. The dolls were identical in every way except one was White and one was Black. Most of the Black students indicated the White doll as nicer. This is evidence of internalized racism. Unfortunately, this test was repeated more recently, and the results were not different. Watch the video here.

In one study, Dr. Chae determined that Black men with an implicit anti-black bias, who reported more experience with racism and discrimination, also had a history of poor cardiovascular health. To quote Dr. Chae, “Internalized negative racial group attitudes themselves were associated with history of cardiovascular disease, and they moderated the impact of racial discrimination on these outcomes.” To measure negative racial group attitudes he used three items assessing whether the respondent agreed with negative statements regarding Blacks, specifically, whether Blacks are lazy, give up easily, and are violent. Dr. Chae will soon conduct a longitudinal study in which he will use the IAT as a tool to determine negative group attitudes and further explore the link to cardiovascular health.

But how does racism get under the skin and impact health? One measure scientists use is the level of c-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is found in the blood and levels rise in response to inflammation; it is also an indicator of poor cardiovascular health. Dr. Tene Lewis and colleagues at Yale University School of Public Health, found that while an African-American’s body mass index was positively correlated with the level of CRP in the blood, so was regular racial discrimination. The thought here is that perhaps stress from racism is putting biological stress on the body, causing CRP to rise.

Another measure of stress and aging can be telomere length. Telomeres are located at the end of our chromosomes. They are made up of repeating units and protect our chromosomes (which contain important genetic information) from being degraded. Over time, the telomeres themselves degrade and shorten in length. Dr. Chae noted a very nice analogy in which telomeres were compared to the plastic casing on the end of shoelaces; our chromosomes are the shoelaces. The plastic end of the shoelace, prevents the lace from fraying. However, eventually that plastic gets degraded and the shoelace begins to fray. Shorter telomeres are a sign of cellular aging (different from chronological age which is measured in years). Back in 2004, Dr. Elissa S. Epel from the University of California found that telomeres shorten at a faster rate in response to stress. Many scientists now explore whether stress resulting from racism also shortens telomere length.

Until recently, it has been hard to truly measure the impact of racism on health because racism is thought of as an intangible idea. It is important to find effective ways to measure racism, stress and aging so that we may keep exploring the link between racism and health. The sooner the links are untangled, the sooner we can devise a solution.

Friday, June 1, 2012

Federal Plan to Reduce Asthma Disparities Released


Yesterday, the President’s Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children announced a new initiative to reduce asthma disparities among children, but especially children from ethnic minority groups and/or a low socioeconomic background. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Protection Agency and several other federal bodies have teamed up to execute a plan of action. Read the fact sheet here.

The initiative promotes collaboration among federal entities and streamlines resources and knowledge surrounding asthma health disparities among children. This partnership also encourages teamwork among individual, local, state and national leaders from various sectors. This forces us to think about asthma in a more holistic manner. Asthma disparities in the United States are not just a medical problem, but also the product of environmental and social inequities.


Asthma can be deadly if children do not seek routine medical care and do not regularly take the proper medication. Environmental factors such as air quality and allergens can also cause asthma attacks. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services spoke yesterday in Washington D.C. about the new action plan. She said the following:


Minority children today are both more likely to have asthma and less likely to be prescribed or take recommended treatments to control their asthma...Without health coverage, you’re less likely to get the preventive medicine you need to keep the condition under control, making you more likely to suffer an attack...you can get great care for asthma at your doctor’s office, but it won’t do much good if they don’t know how to treat it at your school. And you can have a great community health center down the street, but it will be hard to stay healthy if the air in your neighborhood is polluted...If we’re going to reduce these disparities, we have to work together, not just across the federal government, but with state and local partners, and community and private leaders on every front.

Collaboration and leadership among governing bodies is important, and is just one of many partnerships needed to end health disparities. United, we can enact change!  

Read more about reducing health disparities here.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Primary Care Physician Shortage


By 2014, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand the Medicaid health insurance program to over 15 million people. Among many things, this expansion will allow millions of people access to regular primary care. But is the field of primary care prepared to deal with such an expansion?

Primary care physicians (PCP's) serve as the initial contact person for a patient’s health issue. PCP's work with the patient over a long duration of time, treating routine conditions and providing preventive services like vaccinations. PCP's also refer the patient to specialists (e.g. cardiologists, endocrinologists) when necessary. Depending on the scope of the physician’s practice, primary care providers are internists and pediatricians, but can also be geriatricians or obstetricians and gynecologists. Nurse practitioners and physician’s assistants are increasingly providing primary care to patients as well.

For many years there has been talk about a physician shortage in the field of primary care. At one time, primary care physicians constituted the bulk of American physicians. However, advances in technology, increased medical educational debt, lower reimbursements and higher patient loads for primary care physicians have caused most doctors in training to enter a specialty field. The Association of American Medical Colleges predicts that in the decade that began in 2010, nearly one-third of all practicing physicians will retire. As a result, Americans will need an estimated 45,000 primary care physicians by 2020.

This trend has far-reaching consequences. Many ethnic minorities, people with low socioeconomic status or no health insurance may use primary care physicians and/or community health centers as their only source of health care; however, access to these providers is already limited for some patients because of factors like geography and a lack of transportation, or more complex issues like language barriers. The actual shortage of physicians and lack of funding for community health centers only exacerbates this problem.

Also, one statistic from the Kaiser Family Foundation says that 56% of patient visits in America require primary care, but only 37% of physicians practice primary care medicine, and only 8% of the nation’s medical school graduates go into family medicine. Furthermore, a higher ratio of specialists to patients has been correlated with higher mortality rates overall. This suggests that a higher ratio of primary care physicians will contribute to better health. With better access to primary care, patients can prevent disease and receive early treatment in the event of an illness.

The ACA has proposed several pieces of legislation to help solve the primary care physician shortage (the following was summarized from a Kaiser Family Foundation brief):
  • Add 15,000 new primary care providers to the workforce by 2015
  • Allocate $300 million for the National Health Service Corps which recruits the primary care workforce in underserved areas 
  • $230 million in award grants will go to “teaching health centers” to start primary care residency programs 
  • 10% bonuses for primary care providers under the Medicare fee schedule (started in 2011)
  • Increase PCP reimbursements at the state level from Medicaid rates to Medicare rates by 2014 
  • Increase the number of Accountable Care Organizations (ACO's) which thrive on the quality and not the quantity of patient care. ACO's encourage collaboration among physicians and allied health professionals rather than overuse of medical services
  • Increase the number of community health centers 

Lastly, medical education institutions are charged to shape medicine’s leaders of tomorrow. This means medical schools should continue to educate students about issues related to primary care and the state of the health care system. Shadowing and networking with primary care physicians may increase interest in the field. Curricula should include such activities. Also, the number of residency programs must increase in order to accommodate the growing number of medical school graduates.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Race and Disease



What is the difference between health inequality and health disparities? Dr. Olivia Carter-Pokras, Associate Professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the School of Public Health, said that health inequality is just a difference in health; health disparities are marked not only by a discernible difference in health, but also an injustice that can be changed. Dr. Carter-Pokras has over 25 years of health disparities research experience within the Federal government and academia, and was previously the Director of the Division of Policy and Data, Office of Minority Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Here at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), I attended a presentation Dr. Carter-Pokras gave about health disparities.

After the seminar, I began to think about race in general. When I first arrived at NIDA, research fellows were invited to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC. The museum held an exhibit called “Race: Are we so different?” One idea the exhibit emphasized over and over is that race is a social rather than a biological construct. This means that we created the idea of race to distinguish one human from another. However, someone on the other side of the world is only 0.1% different from me at the genetic level. This may be hard to believe considering that humans come in many different shapes, sizes and colors. The exhibit had strong scientific and historical evidence to support the idea that race is purely a man-made idea.

If race cannot be defined by our genes, why do health care professionals use race to infer other characteristics about their patients? Why does the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) require the Federal government to collect racial data?

There are a few instances in which race (heritage, to be more accurate) may help physicians and allied health care professionals better treat their patients. However, this is a line that must be walked carefully. For example, some ethnic groups do have a higher prevalence of certain diseases (e.g. Ashkenazi Jews have a higher prevalence of Tay-Sachs disease and African-Americans have a higher prevalence of Sickle Cell Anemia). If a physician understands these links, a diagnosis may be made sooner. However, sometimes making assumptions about race and disease can hurt a patient. The Race exhibit at the Smithsonian featured a video of a father whose infant daughter was not quickly diagnosed with Sickle Cell Anemia. The parents were both white and Sickle Cell Anemia seemed like an unlikely cause of the baby's illness. However, the father was of Sicilian ancestry. A simple blood test confirmed the baby had Sickle Cell Anemia. This was an example in which generalizations about ethnicity and disease can be harmful. Though it may not be commonly known, Sickle Cell Anemia spread to places in southern Europe as well as throughout Africa.

The ACA is working to eliminate health disparities. In a 2011 report, the American Medical Association says the first step to eliminating disparities is to detect them. If this is true then the collection of racial is data is justified. However, a closer look at what we define as race may actually be an indicator of the greater disparities that exist among social determinants of health. For example, while it is true that many minorities endure numerous health disparities, this is often due to the environment in which minorities live and inequities in education, socioeconomic status, and other factors—not race. Poor whites have similar health outcomes to those of ethnic minorities. Similarly, ethnic minorities with higher socioeconomic status have better health outcomes than their poorer counterparts. Race should not define who we are nor how healthy we can be. We should focus on improving the conditions in which many disadvantaged people live which will result in an improvement in health.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Three CCNY Students Named 2012 Salk Scholars

This press release was taken from the City College of New York's website. The following was released on May 16, 2012.


 





Lisa Brandt and Julian Flores, members of The City College of New York Class of 2012, and Alexa Mieses, a 2011 graduate, have been selected to receive the 2012 Jonas E. Salk Scholarship awarded by The City University of New York.

The awards recognize the high ability and scholarship of students who plan careers in medicine and the biological sciences and who are judged likely to make significant contributions to medicine and research. They are selected on the basis of original research papers undertaken with prominent scientist/mentors.

“Congratulations to Lisa, Julian, Alexa and the winners from the other CUNY Colleges,” said CCNY President Lisa S. Coico. “Their achievements are a testament to their hard work, dedication, and perseverance as well as to the support of the faculty.”

The Salk Scholarship provides a stipend of $8,000 per scholar, to be appropriated over three or four years of medical studies. Salk Scholars also receive achievement citations and diagnostic kits that include an otoscope and ophthalmoscope. The scholarships will be presented at a ceremony Wednesday, May 16, in the William and Anita Newman Conference Center at Baruch College.

Dr. Jonas Salk, a 1934 graduate of City College, developed the polio vaccine in 1955. He turned down a ticker-tape parade in honor of his discovery, asking that the money be used for scholarships instead. New York City provided initial funding for the Salk Scholarships in 1955.

Ms. Brandt, Mr. Flores, and Ms. Mieses were all inspired to become doctors to aid their communities. After graduation, Ms. Brandt will attend either Columbia University Medical School or Mount Sinai School of Medicine, while Mr. Flores plans to attend Harvard Medical School. Both want to become pediatricians. Ms. Mieses will attend Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Brief profiles of the students follow:

Lisa Brandt
Ms. Brandt, born in the Dominican Republic to a Dominican mother and an American father, wants to become a pediatrician to provide free and affordable care to her community. “I wanted a career that had a purpose for me, a versatile career where you’re a student, teacher, and guide, and can be a pillar to your community.”

Ms. Brandt was so impressed by City College’s affordability and high quality of education, that it was her only choice when she applied to college. “I knew I wanted to go to medical school for a long time, and I knew I didn’t want to come out with debt. I wanted to go to a school that would give me a high quality education,” said the biology major.
Currently, she is working in the lab with Professor Jonathan Levitt, using a ferret as an animal model to examine the postnatal development of the brain. She is also volunteering at Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York-Presbyterian and has volunteered at numerous health fairs.

At CCNY, Ms. Brandt received a myriad of honors such as the 2010 Annual Biomedical Research Conference for Minority Students Presentation Award, and the 2011 Collegiate Science and Technology Entry Program Honorable Mention Award in the Natural Sciences.

She also received the Zeldin-Sviridov Scholarship, Edmund Baermann Scholarship in Natural Sciences, Associated Medical Schools of New York Stipend and Student Support Services Program Outstanding Academic Award. Additionally, she shadowed a pediatric endocrinologist, and gastroenterologist in private practice. Outside of school, she enjoys drawing.

Julian Flores
Mr. Flores, the son of Costa Rican immigrants, believes he has an obligation to help the Hispanic community, since he has an opportunity to make an impact. “Being Hispanic, makes me want to want to give back to the Hispanic community to bring about longstanding change.”

That opportunity is a scholarship to Harvard Medical School, where he will pursue his dream of becoming a pediatrician. “It is a great honor to come from City College and to represent both CCNY and CUNY at Harvard,” the Flushing, Queens resident said.

Mr. Flores, who is receiving a BS in biology, came to City College on full scholarship as a Macaulay Honors College student. He used the resources of Macaulay to go beyond the textbook and the classroom.

He counseled parents in a family health intervention program run by Columbia University and also participated in a summer undergraduate mentorship program between his junior and senior years at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Currently, he is using Drosophila Melanogaster, the common fruit fly, as an animal model to study autism spectrum disorders as a research assistant to Professor Tadmiri Venkatesh.

At City College, Mr. Flores received countless awards including: best poster in neuroscience at both the Annual Biomedical Research Conference for Minority Students and the 2012 Collegiate Science and Technology Entry Program Conference. He also received a Weston Scholarship, in addition to the scholarship from Harvard. Outside of school, he enjoys playing soccer and baseball as well as dancing and listening to music.

Alexa Mieses
Ms. Mieses already had dreams of becoming a doctor as a junior in high school. While she attended Bronx High School of Science, three students died of drug-related causes.  A sophomore she mentored was one of them, a victim of a heroin overdose. “The experience definitely inspired me to learn more aggressively about the effects of drug abuse on the brain and the body. It increased my awareness of it,” said Ms. Mieses.
She volunteered at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx and tutored low-income children at the Champion Learning Center in Lower Manhattan.  As the coordinator for the CCNY Minority Association of Pre-Health Students’  “Harlem Take Care of Yourself” health fair, she helped increase attendance twenty-fold. She also interned at the Bronx Zoo, the Gay Men’s Health Crisis Center and worked with autistic children in Chile, as a Watson Fellow.
A Queens resident of Dominican and Italian heritage, Ms. Mieses graduated magna cum laude with a BS in biology in 2011. She deferred medical school for a fellowship with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Baltimore, where she examined behavioral and genetic correlates of drug addiction. The fellowship provided professional growth and gave her access to new lab techniques.

After the fellowship, she will attend Mount Sinai School of Medicine in August and hopes to become a primary care physician in an underserved community. “In addition to practicing medicine as a clinician in New York City, I am also committed to mentoring aspiring medical students and students from underrepresented minority groups.”

At CCNY, Ms. Mieses was awarded a J.K. Watson Fellowship and Outstanding SEEK Graduate of the Year Award; she was a SEEK Scholar and tutor, and belongs to three honor societies. In addition, she shadowed a surgeon in private practice as well as conducted neuroscience research on eye movements and studied Spanish and art history in Spain. Outside of school, Ms. Mieses writes poetry and loves singing. She hopes to incorporate her love of writing into her career.


Media Contact
Ellis Simon     P | 212-650-6460     E | esimon@ccny.cuny.edu

Monday, May 7, 2012

My First Acceptance

On October 15, 2011, I received a phone call from an unfamiliar phone number. I was in Baltimore, in the lab, analyzing data. I am admittedly a die-hard New Yorker (the juice of the Big Apple is in my blood) but I moved to Maryland to complete a research fellowship at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Though I could not take the phone call, I quickly typed the number into Google’s search engine. Normally I am not paranoid. However, the medical school application season had begun several months prior. I needed to make sure I didn’t miss a medical school’s call.

Before I could hit “enter” on the keyboard, a voice mail notification appeared on my phone. Unable to endure the suspense, I excused myself from the room. I quickly dialed my voice mail. That was the day I received my first acceptance to medical school! The school’s dean had called to inform me of the good news. My hard work had finally paid off! 

Applying to medical school is a year-long process. There is a lot of “hurry up and wait.” You work hard to meet the primary application deadline, and wait for schools to send you their secondary applications. You devote time to crafting eloquent secondary applications and wait to be invited to interview. After weeks of interview preparation, the day finally comes and afterwards you are left to wait for the verdict. 

Applying to medical school definitely has its share of drama and suspense but the process is also fun and rewarding. This may sound odd but allow me to explain. First, my desire to become a physician trumps any amount of paperwork. It should also be said that my writing improved as the result of all the essays I submitted. Interviewing was the fun part. I traveled to different cities around the country and had the opportunity to meet wonderful faculty, medical students and other applicants. Best of all, I had an opportunity to elaborate on my past experiences and allow the admissions committees to gain a better sense of who I am. 

The truth is -- that for me, the medical school application process began many years ago. And the truth is that the process never ends. To be a physician is to be committed to a lifetime of inquiry and learning. There will always be more hands to hold. There will always be more information to learn and questions to ask. I will always strive to grow both personally and professionally in the interest of providing better care to my patients.

Monday, April 30, 2012

National Minority Health Month: Be the Change!



To wrap up National Minority Health Month, it is important to outline some of the steps we can take to help eliminate health disparities. These steps all include you! Age, sex, ethnicity, religion, language, sexual orientation and socioeconomic background do not matter when it comes to making a positive change in your life!

Take Charge of Your Health
Change begins with you! Though there are many external factors that can have an impact on our health, we have the power to make little changes that can make a big difference in our lives. For example, getting regular exercise does not always have to involve long hours at the gym. Walking instead of taking the train to work or school, or taking the stairs instead of the elevator can add physical activity to your day. Invest in a pedometer and/or use a calculator for an estimate of the calories you’ve burned. Work with your physician to come up with a safe exercise plan.

Making small changes to your diet can also have a big impact on your health. Control the amount of food you eat at each meal. Reduce your intake of sugary drinks like soda and artificial fruit juice, and instead drink water. Eat less processed junk food like fast food, potato chips, cookies, and sugary candy. You can treat yourself to your small “guilty pleasure” snacks a few times a week. Don’t completely cut out treats as this can make you feel deprived, but greatly reduce unhealthy food packed with sugar, fat and preservatives. Balance is the key! Also, use of a free, online calorie counter such as My Fitness Pal to keep track of your diet and physical activity habits. This website also allows you to access a free app on your phone. Quit smoking and reduce your alcohol intake. These two steps paired with physical activity and a good diet can lower your risk of obesity, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure. Work with your physician or a nutritionist to develop a regular healthy diet!

Go for regular check-ups. Whether you visit a physician in her private practice, or visit your local health clinic—go regularly! The best way to stay healthy is to prevent disease before it begins. In the case you have developed a health problem, treating it early can yield better health outcomes. Make sure to be tested regularly for high cholesterol, high blood pressure, heart disease, HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections, and keep your immunizations current. In addition to a primary care provider, women can see a gynecologist at least once a year. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that teenage girls start seeing a gynecologist between the ages of 13 and 15. Developing a relationship with your physician early on can have a positive impact on your health! Please note that your health needs change as you age. Please visit this website for recommendations for your age group: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002125.htm

Stay Informed
Keep an eye out for current events and stories related to health (and all other issues). Before we can come up with a solution, we must know the problem! In the case of health disparities, exploring the problem and devising a solution will happen simultaneously but we must stay informed and aware. Reading the paper or online news articles, even if just for a few minutes a day, will empower you to formulate your own ideas about the world!

Spread the Word
You can be the teacher! Once you have taken control of your health and have been informed of the issues affecting your health, you can spread the word. By taking charge of your health you may inspire others to do the same. Even if you do not have a career in health care, just by talking and raising awareness about health disparities can help enact change!

For a list of resources regarding health disparities visit: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/disparities.html

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

National Minority Health Month: Kidney Disease and Transplantation

This weekend I visited the Mount Sinai School of Medicine on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Among many other interesting sessions, the faculty presented a session aimed to highlight health disparities. The specific topic was kidney transplantation. The brief conversation that took place made me want to do a bit of research and learn more about kidney disease and transplantation.

Certain diseases such as diabetes and high blood pressure can greatly damage kidneys. Unfortunately, minority populations are disparately affected by these diseases and thus by kidney disease. According to statistics from the University of Cincinnati, the number of new kidney failure cases diagnosed in 1997 was 873 per million in African Americans and 218 per million in whites; 73% of all cases among African Americans resulted from high blood pressure and diabetes; African Americans made up about 13% of the US population but 30% of all kidney failure cases. Obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure among African Americans has become a bigger problem since 1997, and today the health disparities continue to be rampant.

Kidneys are organs essential to life as they filter toxins from our blood, regulate our blood pressure and help our bodies remain healthy. High blood pressure and high levels of sugar in the blood can damage the blood vessels within the kidney. Once damaged, the kidney cannot keep useful substances (like proteins) in the blood. If protein is instead found in urine, it can be the mark of kidney disease.

Over time, kidney disease gets worse and worse. Chronic kidney disease progresses to end-stage kidney disease in which these vital organs completely shut down. When this happens, hemodialysis (an artificial process that  filters blood) can be a life-saver. However, over time the hemodialysis process also takes a toll on the patients’ body and quality of life. Many patients must spend up to four hours a day on hemodialysis which interferes with their daily lives. Patients leave the clinic feeling exhausted. Hemodialysis patients must also follow a strict diet which may be especially difficult for patients who already have uncontrolled blood pressure and diabetes. For people with end-stage kidney disease, organ transplantation may be their only chance at life; many die waiting for an organ.

Organ transplantation is not a cure-all solution. Finding a good organ match, undergoing the surgery and the aftercare that is required are difficult processes. According to Dr. Susan Lerner, a transplant surgeon at Mount Sinai, New York State has one of the longest waiting periods for a kidney. This is the result of a higher number of people needing a kidney combined with a fewer number of donors. While patients wait to be matched to a donated kidney, they can spend more than five years on hemodialysis and remain very ill.

Some studies have found that minority patients are less likely to be referred for kidney transplantation by their physicians. Even if referred, patients must pass a series of physical and mental health assessments. The tests also seek to evaluate the patient's emotional support system and the likelihood that the patient will adhere to the post-operative care plan, including taking prescribed medications. Aside from passing these screening processes, patients must match to a donor-kidney with similar tissue and blood type. Finally, the financial aspects of the surgical procedure must be sorted out before the transplantation can take place. The entire screening, match and transplant process can take nine years!

Social determinants of health such as socioeconomic background and level of education can interfere with a minority patient's ability to pass the physical and mental health tests. Furthermore, the process is long and arduous and many minorities fail to even complete the testing process. Even though African American patients are not required to be matched to organs from African American donors, minorities do not donate organs and tissues at the same rate as their white-counterparts. This fact only decreases the likelihood of minorities finding a perfect match.

Lack of financial resources can also affect a patient's ability to find an donor-organ match. Consider the case of the late Steve Jobs, co-founder and former chairman of Apple, Inc. Mr. Jobs came from an affluent background and was thus able to benefit from being on liver transplant waiting-lists in multiple states. Since he was on multiple lists, Mr. Jobs was able to find a match more quickly and travel to Tennessee to undergo the transplant operation. I am sure that many Americans cannot afford this luxury. Furthermore, after organ transplantation, the medications necessary to prevent the body from rejecting the organ and to treat infections, cost a lot of money. Health insurance, even public health insurance, can help cover the cost of the medication but often cannot cover everything. A patient who actually underwent kidney transplantation visited students at Mount Sinai and said that he had cleaned out his savings of more than $20,000 to pay for one year's medication.

For all that has been described here, it is very important for the medical community and society at large to work harder to raise awareness about health disparities. We must keep raising awareness to encourage research and policy change necessary to help eliminate the growing gap in health equality.

Friday, April 13, 2012

National Minority Health Month: Child Asthma


According to the CDC, 7 million children suffer from asthma nationwide. According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, children in New York City were almost twice as likely to be hospitalized for asthma as children in the United States as a whole. Even more alarming, in recent years, the Bronx has been the New York City borough with the highest overall rates of asthma hospitalizations, deaths and prevalence among children as well as adults. Clearly, disparities exist.

Asthma is a chronic lung disease that can cause the airways to become inflamed and narrow. This can result in coughing, wheezing and tightness of the chest which may make it difficult to breathe. Asthma attacks are often triggered by illness, strenuous activity and the environment; smoke, allergies, pets, mold, dust and pollution can be a trigger. Cockroaches can also trigger asthma attacks, as many children are allergic to the material associated with decaying roaches, and live roaches' excrement. Partners Healthcare, a team of doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists and other health care professionals, cites cockroaches as a bigger trigger than pet dander and dust. Though asthma cannot be cured, it can be treated with regular long-acting medications, and fast-acting medications in the event of an attack.

Children with asthma tend to have family members with asthma, implying that the condition is inherited. However, it is difficult to establish a link between inheritance and an entire race because race is a social construct that cannot be clearly defined by genetics. Asthma can be inherited by any child, regardless of their ethnic background, depending on the child's family history. However, asthma affects children from ethnic minority groups at disparate rates. For example, non-Hispanic black children have a higher prevalence of asthma and die at higher rates from asthma than non-Hispanic white children. Hispanic children have a higher prevalence of asthma compared to non-Hispanic white children.

Many ethnic minority children tend to live in areas in which smoke, mold, dust, pollution and roach infestation may be a problem. These triggers can greatly exacerbate asthma. Due to a lack of health insurance or a regular primary care physician, minority children suffering from asthma may be forced to use a hospital's emergency department for care. Also, due to lack of insurance and/or family instability, it may be difficult for children to regularly take required long-acting asthma medication, as prescribed. One study actually examined the degree to which instability within a family can negatively impact a child's health. Investigators found that family instability is related to poor child health, including asthma.

Additionally, cultural boundaries may contribute to disparities if they result in poor communication between the physician and patient or sub-par care. Poorly controlled asthma has also been linked to poorer performance in school (for example, more absenteeism), and may even help explain the academic achievement gap that exists among children from different ethnic groups. The aforementioned factors contribute to health disparities but are really symptoms of much greater social injustices. In order to rectify the problem, we must more closely examine our society.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

National Minority Health Month: HPV and Cervical Cancer

At the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting on April 1, researchers said that the human papillomavirus (HPV) lasts longer in African-American women than in their white counterparts. This may shed light on some of the disparities that exist among women from different ethnic groups regarding HPV and cervical cancer.

HPV is a virus that is contracted through sexual contact. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are over 40 types of HPV that can infect the genital area, throat and mouth. Condoms lower the risk of transmitting the virus, but areas not covered by condoms can still become infected. The CDC estimates that 20 million Americans are currently infected with HPV.

In addition to causing genital warts, another major health problem that results from HPV is cervical cancer and other genital cancers. Cancer and warts result from the body's inability to return the infected cells back to normal. In addition to the use of condoms, a vaccine (i.e. Gardasil) can lower your risk of developing warts and/or cancer. Gardasil protects against 4 types of HPV. Condoms should still be used because other types of HPV exist, and to protect against other sexually transmitted infections. Gardasil is recommended for girls and boys ages 9-26. Prevention means working to stop something before it occurs. Even if an individual has not yet had her first sexual contact, she should still be vaccinated.

In recognition of National Minority Health Month, it is important to outline the disparities associated with HPV and cervical cancer among women. While the incidence of cervical cancer among non-Hispanic white women was 8.5 in 100,000 women, the incidence was 13.8 and 11.4 for Hispanic and African-American women respectively. Despite the fact that Asians and Native Americans and Alaskins had a lower incidence of cervical cancer than their white counterparts, these minority groups were more likely to die from cervical cancer; Hispanics and African-Americans were more likely to die as well.These disparities may stem from several issues. Regardless of race, uninsured women are less likely to have regular PAP smears, and thus may not learn they have cervical cancer until it is advanced. However, it is also true that many uninsured women happen to come from low socioeconomic backgrounds and/or are from ethnic minority groups. Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a report that in 2005 many uninsured people were just above, at or well below the poverty line. The same HHS report said that Hispanics are disproportionately uninsured as they represent 14% of the general population but 30% of the uninsured population. As a group, Hispanics, African Americans, American Indians and Asians/Pacfiic Islanders constituted 52% of the uninsured population.

Many cases of cervical cancer are related to HPV. Many minority groups are not well-educated about how HPV is contracted, spread and treated. This may relate to the level of access to general education and health care. Even among minority women that are educated and have access to regular health care, cultural attitudes toward Western medicine and the health care system may contribute to these disparities. These same factors can also influence whether or not a woman chooses to be vaccinated for HPV. Lower vaccination rates can lead to an increased risk for contracting HPV, and the development of cervical cancer.

The study presented at the AACR annual meeting found a biological factor that may also contribute to disparities related to HPV. The investigators found that African-American women hold on to HPV longer in the body than their white counterparts; this may be a reflection of their genes and immune systems. Kim Creek, vice-chair and professor of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences at South Carolina College of Pharmacy said, " [the] body recognizes it [HPV] as a viral infection and usually clears the virus within one or two years...It is those women who have difficulty clearing it that are at higher risk of cervical disease and cervical cancer." This recent finding may help explain the higher prevalence of cervical cancer among African-Americans. It would be interesting to study whether other minority groups disparately affected by HPV and cervical cancer, also hold on to the HPV virus longer than their white counterparts.

In summary, access to health insurance, education, health care, cultural attitudes and genetics are all factors that contribute to health disparities related to HPV and cervical cancer. It is clear that this is a complex problem. Cultural competency within the health care system, and initiatives that target high-risk populations will help us make great strides toward the elimination of health disparities.



Thursday, March 29, 2012

Three Weeks In, and the Horns are Blaring

This post was written in June 2010, during my time volunteering with VE Global in Santiago, Chile.

Alexa Mieses
New York, USA

The roar of plastic horns and shouting filled the air as I awoke to the sound of hundreds of ecstatic Chilean soccer fans. Chile had triumphed in their first Mundial (World Cup) match. Upon embarking on my journey to volunteer at Colegio Anakena, I saw hundreds of people painted red, white and blue. I could not help but begin to feel a bit excited, and given that I cannot explain what a red card penalty is, it was clear I had given in to World Cup madness. Mundial fever is infectious here in Chile, which has already begun to feel like home. I cannot believe it has only been three weeks since I arrived.

This trip marks the first time that I have traveled alone for an extended period of time. Though I generally adjust well to new situations, I did not know what to expect. What I’ve discovered thus far is that Chile is a warm and friendly country, and VE Global only made my transition easier. Orientation took place last week and each day served to teach the new volunteers about VE Global’s mission and work. VE orientation was more than just cheesy icebreakers; orientation consisted of seminars lead by local professionals to inform the new volunteers about the Chilean social system and children’s rights, and to better prepare us for what we will endure during our time in our institutions and in Santiago. VE also conducted a seminar on typical Chilean cuisine and even hosted a seminar on Chilean slang, or Chilenismos—que bakan!

In addition to teaching the new volunteers about VE Global and Chile, orientation also served to foster relationships among both the new volunteers and the antiguos. Antiguos are volunteers that have been with VE for at least three months and they are the driving force behind VE culture. They are the warmth in the office and the energy we take with us to our institutions. Antiguos not only offer their knowledge but their kindness and a listening ear. In just one short week I have not only learned a lot from the antiguos but also consider them my friends. VE attracts a certain type of personality which translates into a warm and welcoming work/volunteer community. I am excited to see what the rest of my time with VE will bring!

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Abstinence-only Sex Education and the ACA

I learn something new every day. There has been a lot of news recently about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as the nation celebrated its two-year anniversary (or not, in the case of opposition). Also, today the Supreme Court concluded its review of the health care bill. I support many aspects of the ACA. Although many aspects of the ACAwill be enacted at different times, the Act: does not allow health insurance companies to deny someone coverage because of pre-existing health conditions; allows children to be covered under their parent's health insurance until they are 26; requires health insurance companies to cover, free of charge, preventable health services such as vaccines, mammograms and screening for conditions like obesity and Type II diabetes. Also, this March it became mandatory that federal health programs collect racial, ethnic and language data which will perhaps help us better understand health disparities. However, thanks to a CNN article I learned that the Act also renewed $50 million per year for five years, for abstinence-only sexual education.

Abstinence-only sex education was something I heard about long ago. Then I really began to pay attention to the issue while I was a Public Policy Fellow at Gay Men's Health Crsis in 2009. Abstinence-only sex education places a great emphasis on waiting to have sex until after marriage. Such education often minimizes the biological aspects of sex, and often speaks very little about the use of condoms and birth control, if at all. Such education has been linked to increased rates of teen pregnancy and contraction of sexually transmitted infections. One 2011 study at the University of Georgia examined the correlation between abstinence-only sex education and teen pregnancies, births and abortions.

For every state, the investigators examined education laws and other policies regarding sex and/or HIV/AIDS education. Actual education laws were retrieved from the Education Commission on the States, while other related policies were retrieved from the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the US (SIECUS). All but two states (Wyoming and North Dakota) had education laws and/or policies on record. Each state's laws and policies were assigned a number from 0-3 indicating the level of importance each state placed on abstinence from sex; level 0 laws indicated no specific mention of abstinence, while level 3 indicated that abstinence from sex until marriage was the fundamental teaching standard. The policy level for each state was correlated with data on teen pregnancy, and birth and abortion rates. The investigators also accounted for population factors like socioeconomic status, education level, ethnicity and access to Medicare waivers for family planning.

The results? States that were described as Level 3 (abstinence was their fundamental teaching standard) had the highest rates of teen pregnancy and births among teen moms. The investigators also found that richer states tended to have a higher proportion of white teens in their teen populations, and emphasized abstinence less. These richer states also tended to have lower teen pregnancy and birth rates than poorer states. These results support the notion that abstinence-only sex education is ineffective.

Politics often involves compromise between the concerned parties. In June 2009, when I was a Public Policy Fellow, the major source of funding for abstinence-only education expired. A new bill was signed in December 2009 that provided $114 million to more comprehensive and evidence-based sex education (hooray)! Therefore, I was surprised to learn that the ACA provided funding for abstinence-only education which yields questionable outcomes. But like I said-- compromise.

The debate about whether or not abstinence-only sex education works is important; however, it is the unwanted outcomes with which we should be very concerned. The University of Georgia study found that teenage pregnancy was strongly correlated with ethnicity and socioeconomic background. Public health campaigns that target high-risk populations to educate them about teen-pregnancy and provide better access to preventative services will be invaluable moving forward.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

March is Women's History Month


In celebration of Women's History Month, I would like to highlight the nation's first female and first Hispanic Surgeon General: Dr. Antonia Novello. The following information was taken from the U.S. Government Surgeon General website:

Antonia Novello was born in Puerto Rico on August 23, 1944. She received her B.S. degree from the University of Puerto Rico at Rio Piedras in 1965 and her M.D. degree from the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine at San Juan in 1970. She then completed her internship and residency in nephrology at the University of Michigan Medical Center in Ann Arbor. Novello remained at Michigan in 1973-1974 on a fellowship in the Department of Internal Medicine, and spent the following year on a fellowship in the Department of Pediatrics at Georgetown University. From 1976 to 1978, she was in private practice in pediatrics in Springfield, Virginia.

In 1978, Novello joined the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps,. Her first assignment was that of project officer at the National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism and Digestive Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). She held various positions at NIH, rising to the job of Deputy Director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) in 1986. She also served as Coordinator for AIDS Research for NICHD from September, 1987. In this role, she developed a particular interest in pediatric AIDS.

During her years at NIH, Novello earned an M.P.H. degree from the John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health in 1982. From 1976, she also held a clinical appointment in pediatrics at Georgetown University Hospital. Novello also made major contributions to the drafting and enactment of the Organ Transplantation Procurement Act of 1984 while assigned to the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources.

Antonia Novello was appointed Surgeon General by President Bush, beginning her tenure on March 9, 1990. She was the first woman and the first Hispanic to hold the position.

During her tenure as Surgeon General, Novello focused her attention on the health of women, children and minorities, as well as on underage drinking, smoking, and AIDS. She played an important role in launching the Healthy Children Ready to Learn Initiative. She was actively involved in working with other organizations to promote immunization of children and childhood injury prevention efforts. She spoke out often and forcefully about illegal underage drinking, and called upon the Health and Human Services Inspector General to issue a series of eight reports on the subject. Novello also similarly worked to discourage illegal tobacco use by young people, and repeatedly criticized the tobacco industry for appealing to the youth market through the use of cartoon characters such as "Joe Camel." A workshop that she convened led to the emergence of a National Hispanic/Latino Health Initiative.

Novello remained in the post of Surgeon General through June 30, 1993. She then served as the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Special Representative for Health and Nutrition from 1993 to 1996. In 1996, she became Visiting Professor of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health. Dr. Novello became Commissioner of Health for the State of New York in 1999.

Click this link for more information about the current female Surgeon General, Dr. Regina Benjamin.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Match Day!

Students search for their Match envelopes
Photo taken from: whsc.emory.edu


Today the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) released their results. On “Match Day”, thousands of medical students across the country open envelopes at the exact same time and learn their fate—at least that of the next 3-5 years! According to an NRMP report, close to 47,000 students participated in the Match in 2011.

In medical school students spend four years studying the basic science material and rotating through clerkships in various medical specialties. Each clerkship serves to train the student, but also to allow the student to develop an idea of which medical specialty she will pursue. Will it be Pediatrics? Pathology? Perhaps Preventative Medicine?

Within the four years of medical school, students are required to pass Steps 1 and 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) in order to receive their degree. After graduation, novice physicians complete more extensive and hands-on clinical training program called “residency” that will transform them into full-fledged, autonomous doctors.

The difference between the NRMP and other application processes is that the applicant can only be matched to one residency program. This is a stark contrast to the college and even medical school application processes, in which an applicant can be accepted to multiple schools. The Match is like any other application process—on steroids!

Once decided on a medical specialty, medical students sometimes apply to fifteen programs or more! They travel all over the country to interview with program directors and medical faculty. They meet current residents in each program and explore the geographic area. Finally, medical students rank each program according to their preferences. However, residency programs also rank the applicants. Programs evaluate the applicant's academic record, USMLE scores, letters of recommendation, personal statement, professionalism and many other aspects of the student's application. Both parties submit their rank lists to the NRMP system which uses a mathematical algorithm to generate the best match possible. In an ideal scenario, a program’s very highly ranked candidate will also rank that particular program very high. VoilĂ ! A match made in heaven!

However, creating a rank list is challenging for both applicants and programs. One of the most troubling points for applicants is coping with a lack of control over the process. Students are matched to one program and one program only. Beyond creating their rank list, students do not have control over where they will end up. The student may have preferred to match with a program in California but match to a program in Massachusetts. This can have a profound impact on the student's professional and personal life and loved ones.

A book entitled, “Match Day,” by Brian Eule, addresses this issue exceptionally well. Eule endured Match Day with his medical student-girlfriend. The non-fiction book tells the story of three medical students (including Eules girlfriend) and the way in which the Match impacted their lives; the book also brings in facts about the history and development of the match process. This book is useful for medical students and their loved ones, and anyone interested in learning more about Match Day.

After a 6-month hiatus, Match Day prompted me to write a post. I recently had my own “Match Year” as I learned which medical schools had accepted, rejected or waitlisted me for admission to their programs. This year has been one of celebration as I was accepted to several of my top-choice medical schools. However, I cannot help but think this is the quiet before the storm! In just four months, I will officially begin my transformation into a physician. In just four months, I will be studying for biochemistry and dissecting a cadaver. While this process began many years ago when I first decided to pursue medicine, August 2012 will mark the month in which school officially starts, and I am already thinking about Match Day 2016!